As I was not able to post in my blog last week, I decided to add some reflections to this week’s posting. There were some things that seemed very interesting for me about last week readings, and I cannot avoid making reference to them.
First of all, I just loved the text Teaching Naked: Why Removing Technology from Your Classroom Will Improve Student Learning (http://ctl.stanford.edu/Tomprof/postings/786.html). It may sound controversial to have an e-course on webskills and say that I am fan of a text which title says to remove internet from the classroom. At first that sounded weird to me too. But after reading the text, I saw that the point the author want to state is that the good management of our class time includes using only what is necessary in class, leaving things that can be done by the students individually, as a preparation or complement of the lesson, like using the net, for example. That leads to our topic this week, which is autonomy. I am also very fan of it, keep telling my colleagues, we must teach our students how to learn, then they will learn by themselves. If we do not give them the tools they need, we cannot ask results from them. For example, if our students have never been taught how to search words in the dictionary and find the best definition or synonym for a word, how can we give them an exercise that requires this and expect them to do it?
I wrote in my application for this course that I “strongly believe that the key to work with many students in class is to motivate and teach them to work alone, so that they become independent, and responsible for their learning”. We have to want them to become active, keeping in mind that this does not make us totally passive, but in a different acting position.
Now, I would like to address here a comment Sandra Jeffs did when commenting on a colleague’s posting this week: “We must have good classroom management, motivate students, teach our curriculum, and notice all the subtlies happening with and between our students, etc. Teachers are blamed for a great deal of perceived deficiencies in education. So, are we teachers "super people?"If we think we are "super people" are we setting ourself up for problems when things don't go "perfectly?"
Well, I don’t think we are super people. What I have seen in my teaching life is that we want this label when things are great, but we deny it totally when things don’t work well. And I totally agree with Sandra, since she herself gave an extraordinary answer, saying that “we teachers need to keep our feet on the ground, while at the same time aim for the stars”.
I am surely aiming for the stars, as well as this group and all the other unique teachers I was lucky enough to meet in my life.
Special regards for Roland, for sharing his project with me and for his great words about mine. Thanks!
Marcia


Dear Marcia,
It's never to late to comment on something in the course. I think it's the provocative title of "Teaching Naked" that catches people's attention - but the content is very solid. It's very easy for us as teachers to use the latest technique or tool without really thinking about why and how. New things are fun, but it is important to keep your feet on the ground while aiming for the stars, as Sandra said.
Yours,
Deborah
Dear Marcia,
I have been looking for the right definition of the autonomy we want our students to have. Ihad to read your post to find it. We want our students responsible. In fact responsibilty leads to motivation and motivationto a certain autonomy.
We always want to go to the stars, but we'd better keep our feet on the earth , that means blending interactivity, responsiblity and autonomy.
You're wonderful, Marcia. Your discussion on this post is thought provoking.
Bye, have a good night
Roland
Hi, Marcia
I wrote acomment on your post. The computer didn't acceptit .It said that the comment will be visible after approvaval, I want you to read my comment. among other things, I wrote. That good to aim for the stars, but we 'd better keep our feet on the ground. The ground here is a mixture of interactivity, responsiblity, motivation and progressive autonomy.
Bye, a good night
Roland
Dear Marcia,
I like the way you reflect the ideas. Rephrasing "Why Removing Technology from Your Classroom Will Improve Student Learning" has made things clearer in my mind. I agree with you and Sandra Jeffs that teachers have to stand on sound ground with ambitions that go as high as the sky.
A lot of things are waiting for teachers to learn, apply, do, try, evaluate, convince, modify...etc Teachers are not the type of civilian officials that work just to earn living. A teacher is like a messenger/prophet who has a message to deliver.He has to have a policy that keeps his audience satisfied and sincere followers. A teacher has to have a vision before that message. A teacher must be creative, initiative and diplomat.Teaching is not for uninterested persons. All what we are learning here is tools. What is equally important is the professionalism of the tool user. A teacher is like a candle.
All the best
Ahmed Khattab
Post a Comment